3 ms·
Well, I was speaking more in terms of functionality, not materials. I didn't mean to imply that making a bolt action rifle was easy, but I find it hard to belie
by talmand 14y ago
Well, I was speaking more in terms of functionality, not materials. I didn't mean to imply that making a bolt action rifle was easy, but I find it hard to believe it is harder to make a bolt action rifle versus a semi-automatic AR-15. I'm not a gunsmith, so I could be wrong but the difference in complexity between the two seems to suggest this. I would have to assume that making a single action revolver would be easier than a semi-automatic handgun.
Discussions of quality of the resulting weapon is a different matter though.
If we had printers capable of making a functional gun, then the government can try to regulate individual parts all they wanted. It would make no difference. It's only a matter of time before there's a simple way of making a high quality rifled barrel of your choice of caliber. They would have to look into controlling the materials required; metals, gunpowder, and so on. Even then that's a losing endeavor, simply because how can you tell the intentions of the person buying the materials? You can't.
This goes beyond weapons, the ability to create nearly anything you want in your home with no one knowing opens up a huge can of worms that I feel that most people simply cannot comprehend.
- damoncali 14y agoThe difference is in the complexity of the parts. A bolt gun receiver is much more complex to build than any part on an AR-15, which is the closest thing out there to a gun you can just bolt together. But yeah, this genie is not going back in the bottle.