4 ms·
As the author points out, Apple is fairly unique in its command of vertical integration. Its products are unique not on their feature merits, but because of the
by cek 14y ago
As the author points out, Apple is fairly unique in its command of vertical integration. Its products are unique not on their feature merits, but because of the way they are conceived, designed, built, sourced, manufactured, shipped, marketed, sold, opened, held, and used.
There's another part of this: Apple is fairly unique amongst it's (asymmetric) competitors (e.g. Google, MS, Samsung) in that it only focuses on one customer: The Consumer.
In my experience the behaviors and culture of an organization (large or small) that focuses on the Consumer as a customer is diametrically incompatible with the behaviors and culture of an organization that focuses on Business as a customer. (I feel super strongly that this is a key reason Microsoft's products are often good, but not excellent; the consumer ones and the business ones).
EDIT: I decided to write a full blog post as a response: http://ceklog.kindel.com/2013/02/19/why-nobody-can-copy-apple/ http://ceklog.kindel.com/2013/02/19/why-nobody-can-copy-appl...
- tristan_juricek 14y agoIt seems like this "diametric incompatability" could be a good subject for case study blog articles. Off the top of my head is the shifting of "sponsored links" to take over the initial position in some Google search results. It seems like you'd have a lot more examples of "where these companies get derailed". I know I'd find value in that. :)