3 ms·
That sounds scary, but not crazy?
by Tichy 14y ago
That sounds scary, but not crazy?
- henrikschroder 14y agoThe basilisk argument, in a nutshell, is this: At some point in the future, a near omniscient and omnipotent being, whose existence is not a certainty, will judge you and may punish you if it finds that the actions you take today are not pleasing, according to its undiscoverable morals, and the fact that you know about this increases the risk of you being punished. The parallells to religion should be obvious to anyone with the ability to see the bigger picture, but it's somehow reassuring that even the most rational of humans can transform into a religious nutjob and not realize it. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, etc. :-)
- Tichy 14y agoIt sounds like Pascal's wager to me. I haven't really thought it through in much detail, though - for safety reasons...