Art is a means of expression, whether you can see meaning in it or whether it had any meaning at all or even if you think it wasn't particularly creative. Art s

Art is a means of expression, whether you can see meaning in it or whether it had any meaning at all or even if you think it wasn't particularly creative. Art serves no other purpose other than to be art. In that regard, yes, this can be considered art. I thought it was quite creative in a relatively unexplored medium, your IP, instead of oil paint. And I vehemently disagree with cormullion's comment : http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5239734 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5239734 Consider Malevich's work : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Malevich.black-square.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Malevich.black-square.jpg Yes, that's in a museum. And it wasn't made "these days" either.