3 ms·
The technology to prevent the "copying" of Monsanto's seeds exists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_use_restriction_technology http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
by dionidium 14y ago
The technology to prevent the "copying" of Monsanto's seeds exists:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_use_restriction_technology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_use_restriction_technol...
Of course, they were called destroyers of the natural order of all that is good when they invented it, so they've vowed not to use it. Instead, they ask anyone buying their seeds to sign a contract agreeing not to save those seeds, which should eliminate the need for the terminator gene. Of course, farmers sign this contract because Monsanto's seeds are a really, really good deal for them! Unfortunately, guys like this want to have their seeds and save them, too, even though they signed a contract saying that they wouldn't. Even more unfortunately, most people who hear about cases like this reactively invent a small-farmer-vs-the-evil-corporation narrative that has nothing to do with reality.
- El_Mariachi 14y agoNo, he didn't save the seeds he contractually agreed not to when he made his purchase from Monsanto. The case is about commodity seeds he bought from a grain elevator that happened to include Monsanto seeds. Those seeds were not covered by the original contract, but Monsanto is claiming the right to extend that contract at will.
- dionidium 14y agoThat is indeed a distinction important to this particular case, but not my general point. I should have been more clear.