6 ms·
Should highly visible graffiti (say, on a freeway overpass) deserve harsher punishment than graffiti down a poorly lit rarely trodden ally or in an unlit subway
by jlgreco 14y ago
Should highly visible graffiti (say, on a freeway overpass) deserve harsher punishment than graffiti down a poorly lit rarely trodden ally or in an unlit subway tunnel?
- gfodor 14y agoAn interesting point and I'd have to say yes if you consider the punishment to be based upon potential damages.
- stfu 14y agoAre you enhancing this visibility economics to other "ideas" as well? e.g. that the punishment for the killing some public figure should be higher than the one for some homeless guy?
- sukuriant 14y agoIt is, though. Killing the president would be reason for you to serve a longer term than killing someone else.
- chrischen 14y agoThat probably has less to do with his importance in general than it has to do with him being a special government employee. For example killing a cop would also land you a longer term than killing someone else. You probably wouldn't (or shouldn't) get a longer term for killing a homeless man vs killing Bill Gates for example.
- sukuriant 14y agoAgreed. When he said "public figure", I figured he meant politicians, presidents, congressmen, judges, etc, not people who are just generally popular.
- gfodor 14y agoThere's a difference between slander or property damage and murder.