I agree, it seems recently that NYTimes appears to be embracing 'blogging' ethics over traditional journalistic ethics. They also have a negative bias against A

I agree, it seems recently that NYTimes appears to be embracing 'blogging' ethics over traditional journalistic ethics. They also have a negative bias against Apple, which I assume is purely for headline attention. (I've thought about gathering statistics to back up this hypothesis, how many negative stories vs positive stories over the last couple years.) As the Foxconn story seemed to inappropriately focus on Apple, when the entire manufacturing industry could have been explored. Maybe this is what real time statistics of what people are reading on a news website does to journalism...