4 ms·
I pity our industry, Bold claims "Performance-Wise, C# Trumps Java", no data. TL;DR Don't look at data, look at the principles. Ignore reality, think about how
by Uchikoma 14y ago
I pity our industry, Bold claims "Performance-Wise, C# Trumps Java", no data.
TL;DR Don't look at data, look at the principles. Ignore reality, think about how the world should be. I think as an industry we can't aim lower than this quote:
"In fact, C# is a better fit than Java for high-performance requirements. I'm not referring to VM stats that change every year. C# has been designed from the ground up with efficiency in mind."
And a side note:
"Both C# and Java have generational mark and sweep collectors."
No Java hasn't.
- raverbashing 14y agoI wonder how much of this performance penalty comes from the absolute overengineering of the Java classes and runtime It seems most of the things are done in a very convoluted way and using 6 levels of inheritance. At least that's my impression when coding C# vs Java, and no, I'm not an expert in any of those, but trying to accomplish something in C# is usually easier and straightforward.