Adwords has advertised private jet leasing in the past. The fact that they appeared in my google apps indicates that the technology isn't as scary / all knowin

Adwords has advertised private jet leasing in the past. The fact that they appeared in my google apps indicates that the technology isn't as scary / all knowing as the article tries to lead readers to believe. It touches on but IMO fails to explore a bunch of legitimately interesting topics - the sociological effects of filter bubbles, the ethics/legality of digital 'redlining' (and how Google just picked up a patent for it no less), formation of digital class divides as well as others. It's a post that would have benefited from a less hyperbolic title, and posting on eg a blog where it wouldn't be completely destroyed by editing. I'm not sure who the 1% are supposed to be (advertisers, I guess?) and fluff aside, the article doesn't really have much meat in its current form. Also, wtf with having a second page containing 15 words that on their own read like a drunken friday night text message and don't really tie in as a conclusion?