yeah, I read that. I was saying in general. Though, one thing caught me in the article: Working on behalf of the state, and working in the state machinery is t

yeah, I read that. I was saying in general. Though, one thing caught me in the article: Working on behalf of the state, and working in the state machinery is two different things. If you are skilled, and suppose, you can really do stuff, he did in this case, and as it is, for a minute if we give him the benefit of doubt, that no he is not hacking on behalf of the state, its clear, that since to the chinese govt, itself, he is innocent. And the only thing that can be proven is his skill, through our validation. Which makes him all the very suitable to teach at a chinese IT related institute. so yeah, that might be a good reason to say that, we should introspect, that how should such articles shape our perception of the chinese. Seriously, lets stop looking at who is building more weapons! Instead, lets compete in who is making more jobs!