4 ms·
Your observation is good. Author should clarify this. But in his next articles he shows benchmark against other web frameworks, which shows more justified resul
by robert-zaremba 14y ago
Your observation is good.
Author should clarify this. But in his next articles he shows benchmark against other web frameworks, which shows more justified results
- fijal 14y agoThat doesn't really answer why use the slowest one with PyPy (and no, uWSGI does not work for PyPy, but a lot of stuff does)
- unbit 14y agouWSGI works with PyPY (Obviously with lot of limitations on the features). http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/PyPy http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/PyPy The problem is that for the vast majority of the webapps there is (still) no advantage. I only wanted to focus on that as i have invested days on (really complex for me) pypy sources, and i do not want people to ignore it ;)
- wyuenho 14y agoHis articles don't justify anything. I don't know what his payloads are or how he produced them in the apps. For all I know these 2 "benchmarks" are unreproducible. The author said he wanted to try science, there's nothing scientific about these 2 articles at all.