3 ms·
That is a simplistic assumption. Here is another Rolling Stone article about how some banks were convicted of colluding to suppress interest rates in the US mu
by pmorici 14y ago
That is a simplistic assumption. Here is another Rolling Stone article about how some banks were convicted of colluding to suppress interest rates in the US municipal bond market. The Libor scandal is the same thing essentially they were defrauding small towns out of millions of dollars of interest by their collusion.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-street-learned-from-the-mafia-20120620 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-stre...
- tedunangst 14y agoWow, one Taibbi article backs up another Taibbi article? Coincidence, I'm sure.
- jlgreco 14y agoWay to not actually address anything at all. Seriously, who the fuck cares who wrote the articles?
- tedunangst 14y agoI do. Once I realized all the Rolling Stone articles on HN were the same, I stopped clicking.
- jlgreco 14y agoI don't think I have ever seen someone so fully embrace logical fallacies. Do you have any reason to think the article is wrong, besides who the author is and where it was published? Any at all?
- biot 14y agoYour comment backs up a previous comment you made. Coincidence, I'm sure.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]