5 ms·

I don't think much of slippery slope arguments. That aside, not having DRM for html5 would likely do more harm to the open web than not doing it. Take ABC for

by jshen 14y ago

I don't think much of slippery slope arguments. That aside, not having DRM for html5 would likely do more harm to the open web than not doing it. Take ABC for example, they only let you view their content through flash or through a native app. This hurts the open web more than giving them DRM in html5.

EdiX 14y ago
> I don't think much of slippery slope arguments. They are already closing the "analog loophole" everywhere else with HDCP and DRM enabled theater projectors, it's pretty clear that's where "content owners" want to be.
- jshen 14y ago
  That is not what the bbc is asking for here!