> You forgot Mozilla. And anyone making web browsers. That how it always was, that how it always be: browsers vendors will decide that. Surely the implication

> You forgot Mozilla. And anyone making web browsers. That how it always was, that how it always be: browsers vendors will decide that. Surely the implication was that Mozilla, and any other browser maker who does not or cannot support these locked-down content models, risk becoming irrelevant because the vast majority of people will use browsers that do support the protected content?