3 ms·
I love how ruby fanboy/fanaticism is not downvoted. Just look at your about page. "ruby by day, rails by night" No, no bias to be seen here, move along! You
by hysterix 14y ago
I love how ruby fanboy/fanaticism is not downvoted. Just look at your about page. "ruby by day, rails by night" No, no bias to be seen here, move along!
You are a complete moron. This isn't even comparable with those ruby vulns, they were remote, this isn't.
It is pretty obvious ruby isn't a fully mature platform to develop on, there has been dozens of posts illustrating that. Linux is a stable operating system that is fully mature and capable of running enterprise level software. The fact I need to point this out to you says you are either a troll, or living in denial, either of which are hilarious.
The level of fanaticism towards ruby on this site is unbelievable. Ruby is an immature platform, I'm sorry if this fact makes your stomach turn circles and keeps you up at night.
As illustrated here, http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5230358 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5230358 "But even with access, this is awfully hard to exploit. You need a precisely timed kill, followed by a precisely timed preemption. That's really (really) hard on a multi-cpu machine" This exploit isn't even in the same league as the remote vulns for ruby. There was a working exploit within a day! The fact you'd even make comparison of the two shows how ignorant you really are.
Posts like this make me laugh because I'm sure you will be jumping on the next band wagon whenever the next popular thing comes riding through town, and will probably be vehemently defending that when it has vulnerabilities.
- apawloski 14y agoI'm 100% sure he was being facetious.
- SkyMarshal 14y ago>Cobol on Cogs in DOS /whoosh, right over someone's head.