3 ms·

If you write single-page web apps, you owe it to yourself to check out Ember.js. The learning curve is a little steep, but once you get up and running you can'

If you write single-page web apps, you owe it to yourself to check out Ember.js. The learning curve is a little steep, but once you get up and running you can't beat it for a client side MVC.

scotth 14y ago
Can't beat it? It's good, but Angular.js is definitely a front-runner.
- rxcfc 14y ago
  I think if we're going to start this debate that we need to substantiate the claims on both sides. This is probably not the ideal place for that debate, however.
  - ninetax 14y ago
    On the contrary, I'd love to hear the debate! If not here then where?
    - codygman 14y ago
      here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5230636 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5230636
      - ninetax 14y ago
        Ah, thank you very much.
- camus 14y ago
  they are very differnt , DI is great but all the directive lifecycle pisses me off sometimes. and dirtychecking on huge collections? without a native Object.observe it is slow.
  - rxcfc 14y ago
    Things like this make me extremely wary of Angular's DI: http://www.alexrothenberg.com/2013/02/11/the-magic-behind-angularjs-dependency-injection.html http://www.alexrothenberg.com/2013/02/11/the-magic-behind-an...
  - wycats 14y ago
    For what it's worth, it's not clear how Object.observe will substantially improve the performance of large collections. For example, if you insert an item at position 0 of a 10,000 item array, Object.observe will publish a change for every item (since they are all moved one item down). It is then up to the receiver of those changes to reverse engineer what exactly happened (which is slow). What is needed is Array observers, which would notify the index of the change, number of items removed, and any items added (the `splice` signature). Ember emulates this, but by using a different API than the normal Array API. I hope that future extensions to Object.observe will support Array observation. As a member of TC39, I worked closely with several members of the Chrome team on Object.observe and hope to work with them again on an Array extension to the spec to make Array observation faster. I yearn for a future where Ember can get good performance without having to ask our users to use an alternative API.
    - wolfhumble 14y ago
      > I yearn for a future where Ember can get good performance without having to ask our users to use an alternative API. Could you explain what you mean by: ". . . ask our users to use an alternative API"? Thanks!
      - sandstrom 14y ago
        I think he's referring to the get/set accessors (e.g. `myObject.set('foo', bar)` instead of `myObject.foo = bar`). Here are some resources: # http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/classes-and-instances/ http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/classes-and-instances... # http://jfire.io/blog/2012/04/19/why-ember-dot-js-doesnt-use-property-descriptors/ http://jfire.io/blog/2012/04/19/why-ember-dot-js-doesnt-use-... # http://emberjs.com/api/classes/Ember.Array.html http://emberjs.com/api/classes/Ember.Array.html
- jetako 14y ago
  I chose Ember in part to make use of its sibling framework, ember-data. Is there a relational model abstraction that integrates well with Angular?
tomjen3 14y ago
MVC can be used to build websites, but I prefer something more like MVVM (which may be MS term, I don't know) so I would stick with Knockout.js

If you write single-page web apps, you owe it to yourself to check out Ember.js. The learning curve is a little steep, but once you get up and running you can't beat it for a client side MVC.

scotth 14y ago

Can't beat it? It's good, but Angular.js is definitely a front-runner.

rxcfc 14y ago
I think if we're going to start this debate that we need to substantiate the claims on both sides. This is probably not the ideal place for that debate, however.
- ninetax 14y ago
  On the contrary, I'd love to hear the debate! If not here then where?
  - codygman 14y ago
    here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5230636 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5230636
    - ninetax 14y ago
      Ah, thank you very much.
camus 14y ago
they are very differnt , DI is great but all the directive lifecycle pisses me off sometimes. and dirtychecking on huge collections? without a native Object.observe it is slow.
- rxcfc 14y ago
  Things like this make me extremely wary of Angular's DI: http://www.alexrothenberg.com/2013/02/11/the-magic-behind-angularjs-dependency-injection.html http://www.alexrothenberg.com/2013/02/11/the-magic-behind-an...
- wycats 14y ago
  For what it's worth, it's not clear how Object.observe will substantially improve the performance of large collections. For example, if you insert an item at position 0 of a 10,000 item array, Object.observe will publish a change for every item (since they are all moved one item down). It is then up to the receiver of those changes to reverse engineer what exactly happened (which is slow). What is needed is Array observers, which would notify the index of the change, number of items removed, and any items added (the `splice` signature). Ember emulates this, but by using a different API than the normal Array API. I hope that future extensions to Object.observe will support Array observation. As a member of TC39, I worked closely with several members of the Chrome team on Object.observe and hope to work with them again on an Array extension to the spec to make Array observation faster. I yearn for a future where Ember can get good performance without having to ask our users to use an alternative API.
  - wolfhumble 14y ago
    > I yearn for a future where Ember can get good performance without having to ask our users to use an alternative API. Could you explain what you mean by: ". . . ask our users to use an alternative API"? Thanks!
    - sandstrom 14y ago
      I think he's referring to the get/set accessors (e.g. `myObject.set('foo', bar)` instead of `myObject.foo = bar`). Here are some resources: # http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/classes-and-instances/ http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/classes-and-instances... # http://jfire.io/blog/2012/04/19/why-ember-dot-js-doesnt-use-property-descriptors/ http://jfire.io/blog/2012/04/19/why-ember-dot-js-doesnt-use-... # http://emberjs.com/api/classes/Ember.Array.html http://emberjs.com/api/classes/Ember.Array.html
jetako 14y ago
I chose Ember in part to make use of its sibling framework, ember-data. Is there a relational model abstraction that integrates well with Angular?

tomjen3 14y ago

MVC can be used to build websites, but I prefer something more like MVVM (which may be MS term, I don't know) so I would stick with Knockout.js