3 ms·
Can you explain why it wouldn't work if it was blown in, say, 1000 pieces that would burn faster than it would burn if it was still in one piece? Or maybe that
by martinced 14y ago
Can you explain why it wouldn't work if it was blown in, say, 1000 pieces that would burn faster than it would burn if it was still in one piece?
Or maybe that once it's in the atmosphere there's no burning anymore?
But then what about kinetic energy loss due to air resistance? Wouldn't it work better with 1000 small pieces instead of just one piece?
And aren't 1000* (x/1000) * speed ^ 2 hits better than a single x * speed ^ 2 hit?
I'm interested and despite reading the wiki link I don't really get it.
- gnu8 14y ago1) WikiPEDIA 2) For a meteor so large that it needs to be broken into 1000 pieces to be safely dispersed, it might take a nuclear explosive. Detonating nukes over populated areas is at least as intolerable as letting objects like that impact. Altering their course before they enter the atmosphere is really the only solution.