4 ms·
What about making this a non-profit, run by a board? Different idea, but, for example Matt M. created the WordPress Foundation to independently carry out the t
by 8ig8 14y ago
What about making this a non-profit, run by a board?
Different idea, but, for example Matt M. created the WordPress Foundation to independently carry out the things he believed in.
http://wordpressfoundation.org/ http://wordpressfoundation.org/
- garry 14y agoYes. I love this idea. Right now I have to focus on coding, but this will be necessary down the road.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- prawn 14y agoMight help in the event that something happens to both of you and users are left on a ghost ship of sorts.
- ingve 14y agoApparently, that "independent" WordPress Foundation is still just Matt: "From an ultimate decision-making point of view, the Foundation is mainly just me. [...] It’s worth noting that the Foundation was created purely to be a trademark and IP holding entity that Automattic could transfer its ownership of the WordPress trademark to. There are no “members.”" [0] [0] http://wpkrauts.com/2013/leaders-and-the-greater-good/#comment-881 http://wpkrauts.com/2013/leaders-and-the-greater-good/#comme...
- rickcolosimo 14y agoWithout digging into the specifics of the matter,if the Foundation is indeed a 501(c)(3), the IRS should/will almost certainly have required it to have three independent board members. In addition, having counseled clients on this structure, the benefit of creating a nonprofit and giving it IP is that it creates a public check on anything to do with that IP. For example, while a startup's founders can sell the company, they can't unilaterally agree to sell off the IP in the nonprofit, and the public can challenge any such sales by recourse to a state attorney general's office. It's not perfect, but it helps protect the IP in the way founders want to. In many ways, it's a one-way decision, which is why it works. (Yes, IAAL.)