3 ms·
2) is very optimistic (I wouldn't bet a dollar on it) 8) I'm not sure what you mean with that one, what kind of alternative? (given you seem to exclude transpi
by Guillaume86 14y ago
2) is very optimistic (I wouldn't bet a dollar on it)
8) I'm not sure what you mean with that one, what kind of alternative? (given you seem to exclude transpilers/preprocessors)
- masklinn 14y ago> I'm not sure what you mean with that one, what kind of alternative? I'm guessing one which better handles layouting and modularization. I'm not hopeful though, CSS is way too "good enough", it's probably there to stay and actual layouting features will slowly get (awkwardly) fitted into it[0], meanwhile modularization will likely be left to components. [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/ http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/ http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/ http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/ http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-grid-layout/ http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-grid-layout/ the first two are at least partially supported in all modern browsers, the latter is only supported by IE10.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- franze 14y agonr 8) is a manifestation of my wish that there must be something better "out there", i don't know what it will be. some of the best frontenders i know rant about CSS regularly (and with a passion), and some already started dreaming of something better. lets hope they fix it until 2020. (7 years from undefined dream to market, should be possible)