3 ms·
It wasn't acquired by force by the farmer, it was acquired by force by the great grandfather. Either way, you disprove your own point. The farmer has a more le
by dreamdu5t 14y ago
It wasn't acquired by force by the farmer, it was acquired by force by the great grandfather.
Either way, you disprove your own point. The farmer has a more legitimate claim because he worked for it, he didn't attack someone for it like the guy who showed up wants to.
- vacri 14y agoMy point was that the parent post was misrepresenting the original story. I'm not sure how that's disproved by what you're saying.