3 ms·
The problem is that the social engineering, spyware and daemons can be(and are) turned into undetectable bootkits. I am tired of pasting the below text every t
by recoiledsnake 14y ago
The problem is that the social engineering, spyware and daemons can be(and are) turned into undetectable bootkits.
I am tired of pasting the below text every time, but here we go again:
http://www.chmag.in/article/sep2011/rootkits-are-back-boot-infection http://www.chmag.in/article/sep2011/rootkits-are-back-boot-i...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/16/tdl_rootkit_does_64_bit_windows/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/16/tdl_rootkit_does_64_...
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217953/Rootkit_infection_requires_Windows_reinstall_says_Microsoft http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217953/Rootkit_infec...
I recommend reading atleast the first link.
Here's one juicy bit:
TDL4 is the most recent high tech and widely spread member of the TDSS family rootkit, targeting x64 operating systems too such as Windows Vista and Windows 7. One of the most striking features of TDL4 is that it is able to load its kernel-mode driver on systems with an enforced kernel-mode code signing policy (64-bit versions of Microsoft Windows Vista and 7) and perform kernel-mode hooks with kernel-mode patch protection policy enabled.
When the driver is loaded into kernel-mode address space it overwrites the MBR (Master Boot Record) of the disk by sending SRB (SCSI Request Block) packets directly to the miniport device object, then it initializes its hidden file system. The bootkit’s modules are written into the hidden file system from the dropper.
The TDL4 bootkit controls two areas of the hard drive one is the MBR and other is the hidden file system created at the time of malware deployment. When any application reads the MBR, the bootkit changes data and returns the contents of the clean MBR i.e. prior to the infection, and also it takes care of Infected MBR by protecting it from overwriting.
The hidden file system with the malicious components also gets protected by the bootkit. So if any application is making an attempt to read sectors of the hard disk where the hidden file system is stored, It will return zeroed buffer instead of the original data.
The bootkit contains code that performs additional checks to prevent the malware from the cleanup. At every start of the system TDL4 bootkit driver gets loaded and initialized properly by performing tasks as follows: Reads the contents of the boot sector, compares it with the infected image stored in hidden file system, if it finds any difference between these two images it rewrites the infected image to the boot sector. Sets the DriverObject field of the miniport device object to point to the bootkit’s driver object and also hooks the DriverStartIo field of the miniport’s driver object. If kernel debugging is enabled then this TDL4 does not install any of it’s components.
TDL4 Rootkit hooks the ATAPI driver i.e. standard windows miniport drivers like atapi.sys. It keeps Device Object at lowest in the device stack, which makes a lot harder to dump TDL4 files.
All these striking features have made TDL4 most notorious Windows rootkit and it is also very important to mention that the key to its success is the boot sector infection.
Another bit:
The original MBR and driver component are stored in encrypted form using the same encryption. Driver component hooks ATAPI's DriverStartIo routine where it monitors for write operations. In case of write operation targeted at the MBR sector, it is changed to read operation. This way it is trying to bypass repair operation by Security Products.
- laumars 14y agoAll these articles are a couple of years old now the impression I gathered from chmag is that this is an emerging trend yet, 2 years on, it's still largely unheard of. So I do wonder just how often infected machines (via user space) become subject to rootkits. I'd say it's likely quite a low ratio. Which brings me back to my original point: the vast majority of attacks happen in user space. However, I will concede that I assumed rootkits had pretty much died out entirely. And as security is about covering all bases (both high risks and low risks); I welcome your correction and consider myself better informed :)
- pudquick 14y agoActively working in the Windows server and desktop support world, I can tell you that rootkits are very definitely still an issue. Older XP clients where every process an admin user runs is elevated or newer Windows versions where a "professional" user with administrative rights willy nilly clicks every UAC dialog for escalation without a thought (especially in regards to installers from questionable sources with malicious payload) - or, worse yet, they've disabled UAC altogether (because the dialogs annoy them) and EVERY process is escalated. Products like TDSSkiller are still being actively updated and developed - and appreciated by folks like myself. You can install anti-viral solutions, you can lock down machines with group policy, you can stay 100% on your patching coverage, but as soon as one manager says "my user needs admin rights" - now you've got something you can't lock down.