3 ms·
I tried pelican several times, but I always found it to be too complicated to what I want. I went through setup, generated some pages and when I started to tink
by rplnt 14y ago
I tried pelican several times, but I always found it to be too complicated to what I want. I went through setup, generated some pages and when I started to tinker around with it I had a feeling it would be easier to write something from scratch.
Do you know any other static page generators, simpler and preferably in Python as well? Or should I just get over the first impression and go with the pelican?
- marban 14y agohttps://bitbucket.org/obensonne/poole https://bitbucket.org/obensonne/poole https://github.com/mythmon/wok https://github.com/mythmon/wok http://ringce.com/hyde http://ringce.com/hyde https://github.com/dz/chisel https://github.com/dz/chisel http://mynt.mirroredwhite.com http://mynt.mirroredwhite.com http://tinkerer.me http://tinkerer.me http://nikola.ralsina.com.ar http://nikola.ralsina.com.ar http://blogofile.com http://blogofile.com
- loftsy 14y agoDjango can be easily adapted to write static pages using the template api and writing to a file. Works well for me.
- ramayac 14y agoExactly good sir, that is a great way to go :)
- nry 14y agoI had the same feeling when I was using pelican as well. I have switched my personal site over to blogofile: http://www.blogofile.com/ http://www.blogofile.com/ Much simpler and better documentation in my opinion.
- brass9 14y agoI use nanoc (http://nanoc.ws/ http://nanoc.ws/). It's written in Ruby - but it's quite powerful yet so very simple to use. I've split hair over jekyll/octopress configuration until I stumbled upon this nimble beauty... haven't looked back since. Give nanoc a try.