3 ms·
"Sometimes I want to give the people I’m with my undivided attention. That means the phone stays firmly in my pocket. And as long as no calls or notifications c
by Tyrannosaurs 14y ago
"Sometimes I want to give the people I’m with my undivided attention. That means the phone stays firmly in my pocket. And as long as no calls or notifications come in, that’s fine. But once my pocket starts buzzing, my mind can start to run wild with curiosity. Is someone in trouble, or did a dumb tweet get faved by someone? That game can erode attention after awhile. With the Pebble, I can discreetly glance at my wrist without breaking the flow of conversation."
In what way is this giving someone your undivided attention? You're just slightly modifying the division of your attention and making it easier to hide that you're thinking about something else.
Personally I find a better solution is to either be honest and put your phone on the desk and explain to people that you might be getting a call you need to take, or put it somewhere you can't see, hear or feel it and genuinely disengage.
Not saying I don't like the Pebble, I do, just that I don't think this is a great use case for it.
- laumars 14y agoThis is also where the argument for different notification tones comes into its own.
- risratorn 14y agoIt gets your mind off of the thing without getting your phone out of your pocket ... one glare at your watch and you know if it's worth interrupting your conversation or not. If not, it's just a 2 second interruption at max which should not interfere with your "undivided attention" to the person you are speaking with. This is at least how my "attention" works :)
- unwind 14y agoIt should probably be read as "sometimes I want to give the impression I'm giving someone my undivided attention". Or something like that. I don't particularly want to sound like I'm bashing the original poster, although I did find the argument of his "mind running wild" slighltly worrying; turn off the phone entierly then, or at least the vibrations.