4 ms·

Not extrapolated from a fully saturated link, no. But I didn't mean to imply that was usage billing. I was thinking of fdc in amsterdam in the eu on a 10gb unm

by trotsky 14y ago

Not extrapolated from a fully saturated link, no. But I didn't mean to imply that was usage billing. I was thinking of fdc in amsterdam in the eu on a 10gb unmetered no bw sla, but I also think they offer a similar (slightly higher) deal in denver. I was thinking of somebody else for the US - in SLC - but the name escapes me. If you actually could use the name I'll find it. I shouldn't have said xc as really they expect you to buy power and space from them. Clearly not what I'd try to run an upmarket video cdn off of, but i would be surprised if people like fdc aren't who CF buys from.

Terretta 14y ago
> unmetered no bw sla Those kinds of offers are generally unusable if the bandwidth matters. This goes back to the oversubscription model, selling the same resource to multiple customers and letting the customers jockey for use, hoping most will never use it enough to catch on. See this thread for more: — http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1159276&page=2 http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1159276&p... Note this analysis: “The FDC offer is a shared 10 Gbps and i believe in another topic was explained, that you're supposed to stay at 1 to 1.5 Gbps usage. Even a pure 10Gbps peering port will cost more then $500,- / month, so a true 10 Gbps for anywhere close to $500,- cannot be expected from any provider worldwide.” — http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8153934&postcount=18 http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8153934&pos... And about the actual usable bandwidth: “I always found this to be a problem with all FDC locations. So many places have such horrible speeds that no matter what speed they offer, I have a hard time making a good use of it.” — http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8258933&postcount=27 http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8258933&pos... Another comment: “The server is great. The single-thread transfer speed isn't as much, but it's reasonably passable most of the time, considering the server cost. But I've been seeing some severe routing problems, with 5-10% of the net simply being unroutable much of the time, as well as intermittent packet loss. Due to this, the overall fail rate of this server is about 10x that of other servers I have in NL.” If you're running an ad supported viral image host and can fit your popular content in RAM, this kind of thing may be acceptable, though in the long run users will tend to migrate to image hosts that serve their memes quickly. TL;DR: Not all bandwidth is equal. You get what you pay for and what your provider pays for.

by trotsky 14y ago

Terretta 14y ago

> unmetered no bw sla Those kinds of offers are generally unusable if the bandwidth matters. This goes back to the oversubscription model, selling the same resource to multiple customers and letting the customers jockey for use, hoping most will never use it enough to catch on. See this thread for more: — http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1159276&page=2 http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1159276&p... Note this analysis: “The FDC offer is a shared 10 Gbps and i believe in another topic was explained, that you're supposed to stay at 1 to 1.5 Gbps usage. Even a pure 10Gbps peering port will cost more then $500,- / month, so a true 10 Gbps for anywhere close to $500,- cannot be expected from any provider worldwide.” — http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8153934&postcount=18 http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8153934&pos... And about the actual usable bandwidth: “I always found this to be a problem with all FDC locations. So many places have such horrible speeds that no matter what speed they offer, I have a hard time making a good use of it.” — http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8258933&postcount=27 http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8258933&pos... Another comment: “The server is great. The single-thread transfer speed isn't as much, but it's reasonably passable most of the time, considering the server cost. But I've been seeing some severe routing problems, with 5-10% of the net simply being unroutable much of the time, as well as intermittent packet loss. Due to this, the overall fail rate of this server is about 10x that of other servers I have in NL.” If you're running an ad supported viral image host and can fit your popular content in RAM, this kind of thing may be acceptable, though in the long run users will tend to migrate to image hosts that serve their memes quickly. TL;DR: Not all bandwidth is equal. You get what you pay for and what your provider pays for.