6 ms·
We don't really know.That is the idea, they have to discover it. Is not a qualitative change, but is a really important quantitative change. New applications t
by forgottenpaswrd 14y ago
We don't really know.That is the idea, they have to discover it.
Is not a qualitative change, but is a really important quantitative change. New applications that today we don't really know about will be made possible.
Living in that environment will make them able to "see the future" and design something for where the "puck is going to be."
As an example, Mr Steve Jobs "saw the future" with the network system of Apple, and Microsoft used a supercomputer to simulate their future programs when computer power were ready.
- bri3d 14y agoLiving in what environment? Immersing oneself in the Google Fiber content experience (i.e. Google Fiber TV) isn't seeing the future; it's living in Google's research lab and still following the puck Google has already shot. As for the network speed, plenty of colleges and research institutions have hundreds-of-megabits and higher Internet connections straight to the terminal, not to mention datacenters, Korea, and Scandinavia: I'm pretty sure we know what's possible over a gigabit network and have been able to imagine the "what if everyone had this at home" scenario for a long time. To your analogy, it's like Microsoft using a supercomputer to imagine a future when consumers own powerful computers, except the supercomputer is a $50 gigabit Ethernet switch that's been available at your local Best Buy for years. I don't dispute that this is a productive idea for entrepreneurs, that revitalizing the KC tech scene is a great idea, or that Brad Feld's hacker-house offering is really neat, but I still can't see how moving to an environment that's already existed in other niche areas and is very trivially simulated is going to create revolutionary ideas.