Hard to dislike a guy that writes so well, and I agree with the general premise of recognizing the human capacity, and necessity, for error. But I do think it'

Hard to dislike a guy that writes so well, and I agree with the general premise of recognizing the human capacity, and necessity, for error. But I do think it's a bit disingenuous to compare the "mistakes" of scientists to fabrication and deceit. Would Niels Bohr have been referring to the manufacture of evidence when he spoke of "all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field?"