No, it's not freedom if your only option is to get a job at some company and then slave away in a boring job until retirement. There may be a safety net against

No, it's not freedom if your only option is to get a job at some company and then slave away in a boring job until retirement. There may be a safety net against losing your job - but it ties you to said job. And all those safety nets need to be paid for, if companies are being burdened with that it makes it harder to start companies and become truly free. I am actually very much for safety nets, but I don't see why companies should have a special obligation to pay up. If society wants safety nets, society should pay (and companies would pay their share via the taxes they pay, too).