3 ms·
BitBucket's pricing is at $1/seat/month in the worst case though (assuming you match one of their intervals there). But yep I agree, Github is surely significan
by mcintyre1994 14y ago
BitBucket's pricing is at $1/seat/month in the worst case though (assuming you match one of their intervals there). But yep I agree, Github is surely significantly more profitable than BitBucket.
- RyanZAG 14y agoDefinitely agreed - I use BitBucket to store some private projects, which also means I don't pay them anything (yet). Seems not terribly profitable - I keep a backup elsewhere assuming Bitbucket will go down eventually from lack of funds!
- joshuakarjala 14y agoI wouldn't worry so much about that. Seems like Bitbucket was acquired by Atlassian for two reasons: 1. Free DCVS hosting as a free perk to existing customers, with tight integration to existing Atlassian products. 2. Free DCVS hosting to non-customers, with the hopes of converting some to the Atlassian suite.
- pearle 14y agoA while back my team switched to from an internal SVN system to BitBucket. We're now buying into the Atlassian OnDemand platform so it was definitely #2 for us.