4 ms·
The web may not be fully open, but it is far more open than the closed world of "apps". (Of topic, perhaps...) I hear this a lot, and I think, for the most pa
by SoftwareMaven 14y ago
The web may not be fully open, but it is far more open than the closed world of "apps".
(Of topic, perhaps...)
I hear this a lot, and I think, for the most part, web applications aren't remotely open (in general). While I can use any computer to connect to a web site, very few sites actually allow me to get my data out of them. In short, in my opinion, open access to data trumps open access by various clients.
On the one hand, we have systems that I can connect to with any OS I want but where my data is completely out of my control. On the other hand, we have walled gardens where the data sits, literally, in the palm of my hand. Both situations are ugly, but in the former, if I want my data, I have to pray the developers left me a method to do so. In the latter, it may not be trivial, but it is almost always possible[1].
I wish we had truly open systems across the board. Until we do, I vote we stop calling web systems open, because they are only open in terms of access, and that's not good enough.
1. For example, jailbreak, log in, and scp a SQLite db. Certainly not trivial but at least doable. In no way would I actually call this "open". I just think it is less closed than most web applications.
- rodion_89 14y agoYou still have "to pray the developers left" you a method to get the data in either case as native apps are simply the client-side of an application (just like a web apps). The "openness" of the web is mostly referring to the technology stack (open source rendering engines), the standards, and the freedom of distribution. All of those points are not fully "open" and that's what I think they're referring to when they say that "the web may not be fully open".