Agreed, pretty much 90% of that article was hedging to pander to "outraged" stupid people. Except I think the people that were "outraged" by the original articl

Agreed, pretty much 90% of that article was hedging to pander to "outraged" stupid people. Except I think the people that were "outraged" by the original article are probably mostly fictitious, or at least exaggerated. I mean, what's the takeaway from the article? "Have a diverse skillset". Got it. Mind blown. (Except not).