3 ms·
Man, this is amazing. Think about the endless possibilities. On top of that it will be possible to build a library of objects like: "NormalGuy", "Ninja", "Tree
by alemhnan 14y ago
Man, this is amazing.
Think about the endless possibilities. On top of that it will be possible to build a library of objects like: "NormalGuy", "Ninja", "Tree" and so on.
Then it will be cool to programmatically move them. No Idea if that is feasible or not. Maybe not, but I will say otherwise.
Then we could describe an environment in which they could act in a declarative way. We could add simple behaviours shaped on top of simple goals. Those goals could be described in a similar way as the environment. If we tie a behaviour to an animation we have small drones of "Ninja" that act on themselves (well..kind of).
Or we could move those animation with the keyboard. I mean, at this point possibilities are just to be enumerated.
At the end it will be like a DSL to describe animation and behaviour and environment. Like an engine for videogames, animation, even smart behaviour (not mentioning AI and similars)
I don't know, I smell something really great behind that think that you built.
- DeepDuh 14y agoYour comment reads exactly like an xkcd comic. I wonder why this is..
- catshirt 14y agoforgive me if i've missed any sardonicism, but you might be interested in learning you are describing Flash in thorough detail.
- alemhnan 14y agoahahah, yep you are actually right. A big difference, probably the only important one, is that you could read, and modify, the source using the same medium (the browser). So the gap for people to play with that is almost zero. This is probably one of the forces that have allowed the Internet to become what it is today.