3 ms·
> Being able to have a conversation with someone miles away. That is revolutionary. They are "virtually" there. Well, why not the daguerrotype? But my real qu
by zach 19y ago
> Being able to have a conversation with someone miles away. That is revolutionary. They are "virtually" there.
Well, why not the daguerrotype? But my real question is, what value is there in making that distinction?
- portLAN 19y ago> Well, why not the daguerrotype? It doesn't update in real time. To go back to your Starcraft example, that is why Starcraft is a game, and the screenshots on the box are not. > what value is there in making that distinction? To most people it's a novel way of thinking about it.