3 ms·
Ugh. That's like saying that high-level programming languages "don't count" because you can do that stuff in assembler.
by CodeMage 14y ago
Ugh. That's like saying that high-level programming languages "don't count" because you can do that stuff in assembler.
- loup-vaillant 14y agoI'm not arguing Turing completeness here. I'm arguing trivial one to one mapping. Syntax sugar. Compare: struct foo { int bar; float baz; }; int get_bar(foo); float get_baz(foo); Which would emulate this: class foo { public: int get_bar(); float get_baz(); private: int bar; float baz; }; If you're interested, I wrote more about that here: http://loup-vaillant.fr/articles/classes-as-syntactic-sugar http://loup-vaillant.fr/articles/classes-as-syntactic-sugar