3 ms·
I thought about italicising OCaml as well, but I'd hesitate to call it an object-oriented language. It's more like a functional language that happens to have an
by crntaylor 14y ago
I thought about italicising OCaml as well, but I'd hesitate to call it an object-oriented language. It's more like a functional language that happens to have an object system.
Likewise Common Lisp has an object system (CLOS) but I wouldn't call it an object-oriented language.