2 ms·
isn't this offering cannibalizing AWS load balancers? if I have a set of web servers with a load balancer at front and health checks that takes unhealthy nodes
by lazyant 14y ago
isn't this offering cannibalizing AWS load balancers? if I have a set of web servers with a load balancer at front and health checks that takes unhealthy nodes out of rotation, isn't it cheaper now to just use this DNS fail-over?
http://aws.amazon.com/pricing/elasticloadbalancing/ http://aws.amazon.com/pricing/elasticloadbalancing/
http://aws.amazon.com/route53/pricing/ http://aws.amazon.com/route53/pricing/
- jread 14y agoNot really - DNS failover is typically much slower to respond compared to load balancing because records are cached.
- dsl 14y agoELB is a local load balancer, distributing requests to local servers based on load and availability. R53 is a global traffic manager, distributing requests to datacenters to provide failover and latency optimization.