3 ms·
It sounds like your process isn't handling them well, or you just aren't making them a real part of your team. At my company, we have half our staff in Melbour
by redguava 14y ago
It sounds like your process isn't handling them well, or you just aren't making them a real part of your team.
At my company, we have half our staff in Melbourne, Australia... and half spread out globally around many different time zones.
The remote workers are every bit a part of the team as the Melbourne workers.
I think adopting a more asynchronous workflow makes sense, both to include remote workers but also it can be very efficient (remove distractions).
A tool like Campfire to handle communication is really important too, anyone can log in and see what they missed and you don't need to be there at the same time to have a conversation.
Also, you need to trust them and give a lot of autonomy, it can't be managed in a traditional way.
- ericclemmons 14y agoI think the autonomy is where the problem likely stems from. Everyone handles their own tasks however they see fit, which leads to collaboration in the local office because of the ease in doing so. Perhaps centralizing all communication in Campfire (or one of the recent "Show HN" posts) rather than our daily Skype call would help alleviate that...