3 ms·
From a triage point of view, Ruby/RoR is excellent. I'm not trying to hate on Ruby people - the community is amazing and the inherent openness and transparency
by polemic 14y ago
From a triage point of view, Ruby/RoR is excellent. I'm not trying to hate on Ruby people - the community is amazing and the inherent openness and transparency is to be lauded.
That's not my issue though. The project's reputation is fiercely protected by it's community - and I wonder at what point this could be damaging. To borrow some terminology, they're not `user-space` bugs like the majority of PHP security flaws (for example). They're bugs in the firmament.
Talking to penetration testers, you often hear this story: if it's .NET, you're going to have a hard time; If it's PHP, you can count on the developer leaving an injection flaw of varying exploitability; If it's RoR, you can count on an out of date package with a critical flaw that bypasses the app entirely. (btw: I'm primarily a python/django person - I won't comment on that!).
- gfodor 14y agoThis is a classic concern troll. If you're not interested in RoR, don't click on threads about RoR. If you do, don't come in and tell people to stop thanking people for their hard work to fix security issues.
- alinajaf 14y ago> Talking to penetration testers, you often hear this story: if it's .NET, you're going to have a hard time; If it's PHP, you can count on the developer leaving an injection flaw of varying exploitability; If it's RoR, you can count on an out of date package with a critical flaw that bypasses the app entirely. Do any real life pentesters here on HN concur with this summary?