3 ms·
what? no, this is ridiculous. did jim cramer or CNBC directly cause the financial meltdown? of course not. but that does not excuse bad/irresponsible behavio
by noodle 18y ago
what? no, this is ridiculous.
did jim cramer or CNBC directly cause the financial meltdown? of course not. but that does not excuse bad/irresponsible behavior of the individual or lower levels.
edit #3: i'm having trouble getting my point across correctly, i feel, so i'm going to just leave it at what i've written.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- jpendry 18y agothe link was really good, thank you. as to this being on HN, i thought i'd just throw it at the wall and see if it stuck. in some manner, it is still an escape from the knee jerk masses because it takes the currently under-reported side of cramer, but i take your point that it's not dealing with these: http://www.scheme.com/tspl3/further.html#./further:h3 http://www.scheme.com/tspl3/further.html#./further:h3
- igorgue 18y agocall it terrorists, Enron or Jimmy Cramer, is US tradition to blame one person to the whole problem... and we are happy about it, oh now we know who is evil, lets blame him!
- jerf 18y agoYour message is excessively specific. s/US/human/. (Or were you going for the irony of demonstrating the fallacy you are highlighting by example, albeit on a slightly larger scale?)
- igorgue 18y agoYeah you're right, but not "human" its better if we call it "society" its not human nature to be like we are.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]