6 ms·
Depending on the language used Emacs and Vim provide these features as well and not just as dozens of brittle extensions. Emacs + Slime for Common Lisp program
by aerique 14y ago
Depending on the language used Emacs and Vim provide these features as well and not just as dozens of brittle extensions.
Emacs + Slime for Common Lisp programming is often held up as an example of this. It provides all the features you mentioned + more. Slime (or rather Swank and alternatives that have been made) has been used for other languages as well: Clojure, JavaScript, Haskell, Ruby, R.
If you work in more than one language then Emacs and Vim quickly start to look enticing since most IDEs either don't support them or don't support them well.
That said, I have no opinion on IntelliJ. I have never used it, but it sure sounds like I should try it out sometime. The last IDE I used was XCode one year ago and Eclipse a couple of years ago and they didn't make me very happy.
edit: My point is, people often hold up both Emacs and Vim as "just text editors" but coupled with a Unix environment and the right programming languages (not Java) they provide a lot of features that IDEs do. Besides that one can use these editors for a lot of other editing tasks like writing manuscripts, e-mail, blogs, etc. giving you the same powerful editing functionality for those tasks.
- mgkimsal 14y agoI was a big netbeans fan for a couple years precisely because it supported multiple languages decently. I've done some work in Eclipse (raw Eclipse, Aptana and Zend Studio), but tend to prefer Jetbrains products for most situations. Doing Grails work, Intellij was the best purchase I ever made - it saved me countless hours in tracing through and learning code I didn't write.
- vineet 14y agoSo, basically to take advantage of Emacs/Vi you need to just restrict yourself to Lisp? I would hands down pick the right language for a project and then the editor. (I am actually a Vi guy, but switch to an IDE for any project that involves more than just me)
- aerique 14y agoNo, Lisp was just an example.
- coldtea 14y ago>Depending on the language used Emacs and Vim provide these features as well and not just as dozens of brittle extensions. People saying this have never really spend much time with a modern IDE. It's like having Vim newbies saying it's too difficult and they prefer Pico, only in this case it's the IDE that's the more advanced.
- aerique 14y agoOk, tell me which modern IDE I should spent some time with. Is IntelliJ IDEA mentioned here good enough? I'm working on a personal project in my spare time which I can use it on. (Except the project is using Common Lisp so it might not be a good match.) I forgot to mention in my original post that I've also spent time with Unity3D recently although for some reason I didn't think of it when thinking of IDEs I had used in the past.
- coldtea 14y ago>Ok, tell me which modern IDE I should spent some time with. Is IntelliJ IDEA mentioned here good enough? Yes, it's quite good. Visual Studio is also very good in some aspects. And you can also get a lot of mileage out of Eclipse. Also try some Smalltalk environment, you'd be surprised. The thing is, there are things missing from Vim/Emacs that are not easily added as ad-hoc plugins. Not merely this or that feature: what is mostly missing is a coherence in supporting a specific language.
- MartinCron 14y agoVisual Studio is also very good in some aspects And once you get ReSharper, also from JetBrains, Visual Studio becomes quite good, too :)
- EnderMB 14y agoAnyone I know that has ever used ReSharper will struggle to work without it. ReSharper is one of the best tools I've ever used, and it makes writing C# a joy.