What a terrible, lazy article. Twitter doesn't need to add lots of largely unnecessary features (or "innovation") to their site. What it needs, and what their

What a terrible, lazy article. Twitter doesn't need to add lots of largely unnecessary features (or "innovation") to their site. What it needs, and what their team is presumably working on, is focusing on ensuring that their core functionality works correctly and keeping the whole site up and running during their explosive growth. The fact they're willing to rely on leveraging 3rd parties and providing the core tools to let users innovate should be considered a good thing and other companies should model themselves on Twitter's openness and willingness for co-operation. And who is the author to call the staff "lazy" because they aren't focusing on what he wants or because he doesn't directly see what they're doing?