3 ms·
I'm not arguing that it's a bad language. I was happy to pay up. It perfectly suits my needs. I'm just saying that it'd be a ridiculous "general-purpose" langu
by RaphiePS 14y ago
I'm not arguing that it's a bad language. I was happy to pay up. It perfectly suits my needs.
I'm just saying that it'd be a ridiculous "general-purpose" language because anyone who wants to use it must shell out nearly a third of a grand.
I think it fills a fantastic niche for math and science, where its powerful capabilities really come in handy. But general purpose scripting? Silly.
- Evbn 14y agoWhy would the price make it ridiculous to use it for more puprposes and thus amortize its cost?
- RaphiePS 14y agoAhh, I was assuming the parent to my comment was implying that people who don't already have Mathematica should check it out for general-purpose programming. If you've already bought Mathematica, great, use it for whatever you want! However, I don't think you should buy it unless you actually need its advanced features.