> free speech is restricted Where I live (Brazil) there are, regrettably, a lot more restrictions to free speech than in the U.S.. But I don't think one error

> free speech is restricted Where I live (Brazil) there are, regrettably, a lot more restrictions to free speech than in the U.S.. But I don't think one error is justification for another one. > free speech is restricted if it is directed to lead to "imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action" Ok, I can accept this. But I don't understand how mocking a religion leads to "imminent lawless action".