4 ms·
Sure. Because it is so common to have unstable linux-software but the so highly popular Windows is so stable. I once had to start Windows in Rescue Mode and do
by onli 14y ago
Sure. Because it is so common to have unstable linux-software but the so highly popular Windows is so stable.
I once had to start Windows in Rescue Mode and do some weird stuff there just to get Steam back running. It failed to start suddenly and seemingly without cause. For a while (some years ago) I couldn't boot Windows at all until I unplugged a dvd-drive (linux was running fine) - I still use that dvd-drive, windows starts with it again. I bought GTA 4 and couldn't play it because Games for Windows Live wasn't working (still doesn't, but i found the hidden offline-mode). Sometimes I can't delete files in Windows with no cause whatsoever.
At the same time, I'm using a rock-stable Ubuntu LTS with a custom "desktop environment" on the same hardware and never had any real issues i still remember. Oh, thinking a bit longer about it, there were some issues when upgrading to this lts: plymouth didn't stop itself (i had to end it via the rc.local) and pulseaudio didnt work (switched to alsa). That's about it.
Following the herd doesn't lead to an easy life, the herd willingly runs down a cliff.
- firedev 14y agoI use Ubuntu (and Debian before that) in production servers and can't complain. Now I am thinking about trying Ubuntu as a desktop, but didn't get a box for it to live in.
- onli 14y agoTo be fair to batterseapower: Ubuntu on the desktop could be an example of not-that-mainstream software which doesn't always work well. Unity at the beginning deserved its reputation, that it was a change from a stable Gnome 2 to an unstable experiment. Guess it is not so bad anymore, but if you liked Ubuntu in production servers, going the route of a small window manager could be more your style (don't know if I'm stating stuff obvious to you, just in case).