3 ms·
Ok, perfect, that would be a fascinating question to ask. Is there any randomized controlled trial supporting that notion? I would suspect that everything is re
by carbocation 14y ago
Ok, perfect, that would be a fascinating question to ask. Is there any randomized controlled trial supporting that notion? I would suspect that everything is reducible, but experiment trumps theory.
- Alex3917 14y ago"Is there any randomized controlled trial supporting that notion?" There are definitely trials showing that marijuana is more effective than pure THC. As for whether it holds as a general rule, I don't think that's really empirically testable since there are probably an infinite number of cases both where it is and isn't true. I don't think everything is reducible though, because for any given plant there are trillions upon trillions of possible permutations of chemicals, and I think the fact that it's a little bit different every day and somewhat random probably helps to prevent the efficacy from declining over time, as happens with most pharmaceuticals. (The first rule of recreational drug is 'rotate your receptors', and I see no reason as to why that shouldn't apply to medicine as well.)