5 ms·
No, that's just the abstract. Claim 1, for example, reads as follows: 1. A computer-implemented method for providing recurring delivery of products, th
by monochromatic 14y ago
No, that's just the abstract. Claim 1, for example, reads as follows:
1. A computer-implemented method for providing recurring delivery of
products, the method comprising performing instructions under the control of
a computer system for:
receiving at the computer system a designation of a delivery slot and
a recurring delivery list comprising one or more list items, each of
the one or more list items identifying a product, a quantity to deliver,
and a frequency of delivery;
periodically generating, by the computer system, an order having a date
and time for delivery based on a next occurrence of the delivery slot, the
order being generated in advance of the date and time for delivery such that
the order has a period of time of pendency prior to the delivery;
creating, by the computer system, one or more order items for the order
based on a last delivery date and the frequency of delivery of each
list item in the recurring delivery list;
receiving at the computer system a change made to a first list item of the
recurring delivery list during the period of time of pendency of the order;
in response to receiving the change, determining, by the computer system,
whether the order includes an order item corresponding to the first list item;
in response to determining that the order includes an order item corresponding
to the first list item, modifying, by the computer system, the order
item corresponding to the first list item based on the change made to the
first list item of the recurring delivery list; and
providing, by the computer system, the order to an order fulfillment system
capable of causing the one or more order items to be delivered
substantially on the date and time for delivery.
Now, I consider myself a creative person. But I would have a hell of a time trying to read that claim on a fucking milkman.
Learn to read patents, people.
edit: Formatting is really hard apparently.
- arbuge 14y agoIt looks like a longish and important claim, but it still seems to me to describe trivial stuff that shouldn't be patentable to begin with. It's just a sequence which is pretty obvious to any clear-minded person once the business requirement is stated. It's one wildly broken patent system that grants patents on this kind of stuff.
- hermannj314 14y agoit still seems to me to describe trivial stuff It is patent number 8,370,271. With numbers that large, it probably has to allow trivial stuff. I'm just glad that on November 2nd, 2029, society will be able to use a computer system to manage a list of items to be delivered. We have only to thank the brilliant minds at Amazon and the framers of our Constitution, otherwise such an important contribution to science and the useful arts may have been lost for generations.
- smsm42 14y agoThat is provided patent terms won't be extended - to promote even more Useful Arts. Because, you know, there's never enough Useful Arts, and if patents help promoting them - why not extend them for longer terms? Look what is happening to copyrights - once Public Domain advancement line hits Mickey Mouse, it stops dead. Why patents shouldn't work this way too? After all, people seem to be fine living with this broken system and writing this kind of patents and pay millions to lawyers to sue each other over such un-trivial questions as who invented linked lists and who invented delivery schedules.
- j-g-faustus 14y agoIt still doesn't sound very impressive if you translate it to plain English: A computer-implemented method for providing recurring delivery of products, the method comprising performing instructions under the control of a computer system for: Create a list on a computer. receiving at the computer system a designation of a delivery slot and a recurring delivery list comprising one or more list items, each of the one or more list items identifying a product, a quantity to deliver, and a frequency of delivery; Listing where, what and how often to deliver. periodically generating, by the computer system, an order having a date and time for delivery based on a next occurrence of the delivery slot, the order being generated in advance of the date and time for delivery such that the order has a period of time of pendency prior to the delivery; Each day, create a list of the deliveries to be made today creating, by the computer system, one or more order items for the order based on a last delivery date and the frequency of delivery of each list item in the recurring delivery list; For each delivery, list which items to deliver. receiving at the computer system a change made to a first list item of the recurring delivery list during the period of time of pendency of the order; If the customer updates their order, change the delivery. in response to receiving the change, determining, by the computer system, whether the order includes an order item corresponding to the first list item; Compare the customer update to the delivery stored in the system. in response to determining that the order includes an order item corresponding to the first list item, modifying, by the computer system, the order item corresponding to the first list item based on the change made to the first list item of the recurring delivery list; and Change the deliverly list in the system to reflect the customer update. providing, by the computer system, the order to an order fulfillment system capable of causing the one or more order items to be delivered substantially on the date and time for delivery. Give the list of "today's deliveries" to someone who can actually make the delivery. I still fail to see how this differs dramatically from pretty much every delivery service ever. The delivery guys may not create these lists themselves, but their dispatchers do. The only thing that differs from say UPS is the 'recurring order' part - say "send me three lettuce every Friday". But grocery deliveries have worked like this for quite a while.
- notintokyo 14y ago
- glesica 14y agoSounds pretty obvious to me. I get my pet supplies delivered in exactly this manner by Petflow. I have to assume that their ordering system is implemented using a computer...
- newishuser 14y agoDude... everything in that claim is what a milkman literally does. Literally! Especially if that milkman uses computers.
- vacri 14y agoMonthly standing orders in computer systems go back at least to the early 90s. How does this patent get granted in light of prior art and obviousness?