My lawyer friend always said 'the probative value must outweigh the prejudicial value' for evidence to be accepted. So just because something is true and relev

My lawyer friend always said 'the probative value must outweigh the prejudicial value' for evidence to be accepted. So just because something is true and relevant, is not sufficient to make it admissible as evidence. So, I guess I can see that argument here. Just because the software has a "bug" isn't sufficient to conclude the results are not accurate. The prejudicial value outweighs the probative value.