26 ms·
Her call to action is really misguided. She's making it personal and obviously (and understandably) is out for blood. However, restrain is called for. Instea
by newbie12 14y ago
Her call to action is really misguided. She's making it personal and obviously (and understandably) is out for blood. However, restrain is called for. Instead, she should be focused ONLY on getting public access to the materials under protective order. Once those docs are revealed, the process will take care of the rest if there really was misconduct.
- scarmig 14y agoA lot of faith in the process, there. For some reason, whenever there's a lot of public anger, the process just so happens to disproportionately end up going the way of public anger. Not all the time, but a lot of the time. Cf. healthcare law and its route through the judicial process.