2 ms·
"so often"? Really? That must be a rather particular age bracket, as newer programmers probably don't know Perl at all (apart from its reputation), and the old
by mhd 14y ago
"so often"? Really? That must be a rather particular age bracket, as newer programmers probably don't know Perl at all (apart from its reputation), and the old Unix-heads know that Perl itself didn't really invent them (or basically anything, as Larry Wall would be the first to admit).
Sure, "Perl compatible" is a pretty common moniker (as in e.g. the "PCRE" library), as the POSIX (or original grep/sed) implementations are a bit anemic.
And I don't think any of them deserves to be compared with astrology, but don't particularly care to get into that argument again. About as worthless as vim/emacs/IDE discussions.
- lutusp 14y ago> "so often"? Really? The relationship with Perl was a point made in the linked article. I personally don't use Perl any more, but I certainly use regular expressions. > And I don't think any of them deserves to be compared with astrology ... No, that wasn't meant as an analogy, just an example of contrasting entities that are sometimes confused. > About as worthless as vim/emacs/IDE discussions. Complete agreement.