I am in two minds about the "community" aspect of Ubuntu. It is true that Ubuntu has many users. Subsequently, whenever you run into a question, you will get lo

I am in two minds about the "community" aspect of Ubuntu. It is true that Ubuntu has many users. Subsequently, whenever you run into a question, you will get lots of Ubuntu-specific posts. The problem I see with this is, however, that with a higher volume comes a higher number of a) unanswered or b) duplicate or c) redundant questions/answers, and since Ubuntu markets itself as "the distribution for everyone", many questions are very basic (→ "signal-to-noise", etc.). The Arch wiki, on the other hand, often offers in-depth writeups, guides and howtos, simply because that is its philosophy and it is geared towards a more proficient but therefore also significantly more specialised userbase. Now, I use neither Ubuntu nor Arch, yet I find the Arch community's work infinitely more helpful and transferable than the documentation churned out by the Ubuntu machinery. Size is a double-edged sword, you have a better chance of finding something, yet finding good solutions becomes substantially harder,