3 ms·
>No, you do not. Good example. This. This is the reason people are reacting poorly to what you're saying. Pretending that a sweeping statement like that can
by thedufer 14y ago
>No, you do not. Good example.
This. This is the reason people are reacting poorly to what you're saying. Pretending that a sweeping statement like that can cover every possible website is _absurd_. The same goes for webfonts.
The question you're answering was not meant to be answered by you. It has to be weighed by each site designer. Saying otherwise is offensive to the people who take the time to answer those kind of questions differently for each project they work on.
- papsosouid 14y ago>This is the reason people are reacting poorly to what you're saying I didn't see anyone react poorly. There is nothing bad about polite disagreement. I enjoy hearing other people's views, and having them try to convince me of the merits of their views. >Pretending that a sweeping statement like that can cover every possible website is _absurd_ I obviously disagree. Can you give me an example of where deliberately choosing to make your website harder to read is a good choice? And that would be considered good web design?